Home › Advanced Metrics Explained
What is xG and PPDA? A football metrics primer
Modern football coverage is full of numbers that look precise and mean something specific — and only one of those two things is guaranteed. Expected goals, expected assists, passes allowed per defensive action and field tilt each answer a narrow question, and each one can mislead you the moment you forget what that question was. This primer takes the two metrics readers meet first, xG and PPDA, and explains what they are actually measuring.
The goal is not to memorise a figure. It is to know, for any metric you meet on a dashboard, what it counts, what it deliberately ignores and what a high or low value does and does not prove about a team. Once you can ask those three questions, the rest of football analytics becomes much easier to read honestly.
What expected goals really measures
Expected goals assigns a probability to each shot, based on how likely a shot from that situation is to be scored, and then sums the probabilities. A shot taken from a central position close to goal, with no defender blocking the line, carries a high value; a hopeful effort from distance carries a low one. Adding the values of every shot a team takes produces a single number that describes the quality of the chances it created.
The important word is quality, not quantity. xG does not count shots, predict the score or judge the shooter. It answers one question: how good were the chances? A team can take more shots and still post a lower xG than its opponent, because shot location and situation matter far more than volume.
Where an xG model gets its numbers
A model learns from a large set of historical shots which situations tend to become goals. The inputs usually include the distance and angle to goal, the body part used, the phase of play and how much pressure the shooter faced. Feed those features to the model and it returns a probability for a new shot.
Different providers choose different inputs, which is why two dashboards can report different xG for the same match. One model might include the goalkeeper position and the number of defenders between ball and goal; another might not. Neither is wrong — they simply define a slightly different question.
What PPDA tells you about pressing
Passes allowed per defensive action measures how many passes the opponent completes for every defensive action a team makes in the opponent half. Divide opponent passes by defensive actions and you get the ratio. A low number means a team allows very few passes before it intervenes — a sign of an aggressive, high press.
PPDA is a description of intensity, not of success. A team can press ferociously and still concede, and a team can sit deep with a high PPDA and win comfortably. The metric tells you where and how hard a team engages, not whether engaging that way was a good idea.
The two numbers side by side
Reading xG and PPDA together already sketches a team. High xG with a low PPDA suggests a side that presses high and creates good chances. Low xG with a low PPDA suggests pressing without penetration. High xG with a high PPDA suggests a team that sits back and strikes on the break. None of these readings is a verdict — they are hypotheses worth checking against what you see.
This is the honest way to use analytics. A metric narrows your attention to a question; vision and context answer it. Treat any single number as the final word and you will be confidently wrong, because the definition of the metric always leaves something out.
The three questions to ask of any metric
Before you quote a number, run it through the same short checklist every time. It takes ten seconds and it prevents most of the misreadings that fill football arguments.
- What exactly does it count, and what is the formula?
- What does it deliberately leave out of the picture?
- Over what sample was it measured — one match, a season, a career?
- Does it describe a process or an outcome?
- Could a different style make the same value mean something else?
- Has the definition changed between seasons or providers?
Metric families across a football dashboard
Different families of metrics describe different phases of the game. Grouping them stops you from comparing numbers that measure unrelated things.
The two metrics at a glance
A compact reference for the first two metrics any reader meets. Note that both are descriptions, never predictions.
| Metric | What it measures | What it does not tell you |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | Quality of the chances a team created | Whether those chances were taken |
| Passes allowed per defensive action (PPDA) | How few passes a team allows before engaging | Whether the press actually won the ball back |
| Combined reading | A first sketch of how a team plays | The reason behind the behaviour |
Start with the mechanics, not the number
Every metric on a football dashboard is a definition wearing a number as a mask. Learn the definition of xG and PPDA first, and the figures you read afterwards will mean something you can defend. Learn only the figures, and you inherit a hundred confident conclusions that collapse the first time someone asks what the model counted.
Read next
Expected goals (xG): how the metric is built
Shot location, angle, body part and defenders: the ingredients of an xG model and why a single number never tells the whole story.
Expected assists (xA): valuing the final pass
How xA scores a pass by the quality of the chance it creates, and how to use it without overrating a creative midfielder.
PPDA explained: quantifying pressing intensity
Passes allowed per defensive action: the formula, what it captures about pressing and the traps in comparing teams across styles.